You are here: irt.org | RFCs | RFC6287 [ previous next ]
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) D. M'Raihi Request for Comments: 6287 Verisign, Inc. Category: Informational J. Rydell ISSN: 2070-1721 Portwise, Inc. S. Bajaj Symantec Corp. S. Machani Diversinet Corp. D. Naccache Ecole Normale Superieure June 2011 OCRA: OATH Challenge-Response Algorithm Abstract This document describes an algorithm for challenge-response authentication developed by the Initiative for Open Authentication (OATH). The specified mechanisms leverage the HMAC-based One-Time Password (HOTP) algorithm and offer one-way and mutual authentication, and electronic signature capabilities. Status of This Memo This document is not an Internet Standards Track specification; it is published for informational purposes. This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has received public review and has been approved for publication by the Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Not all documents approved by the IESG are a candidate for any level of Internet Standard; see Section 2 of RFC 5741. Information about the current status of this document, any errata, and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6287. Copyright Notice Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the document authors. All rights reserved. This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of publication of this document. Please review these documents M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 1]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described in the Simplified BSD License. Table of Contents 1. Introduction ....................................................3 2. Notation and Terminology ........................................3 3. Algorithm Requirements ..........................................3 4. OCRA Background .................................................4 4.1. HOTP Algorithm .............................................4 5. Definition of OCRA ..............................................5 5.1. DataInput Parameters .......................................5 5.2. CryptoFunction .............................................7 6. The OCRASuite ...................................................8 6.1. Algorithm ..................................................9 6.2. CryptoFunction .............................................9 6.3. DataInput ..................................................9 6.4. OCRASuite Examples ........................................10 7. Algorithm Modes for Authentication .............................10 7.1. One-Way Challenge-Response ................................11 7.2. Mutual Challenge-Response .................................12 7.3. Algorithm Modes for Signature .............................13 7.3.1. Plain Signature ....................................13 7.3.2. Signature with Server Authentication ...............14 8. Security Considerations ........................................16 8.1. Security Analysis of OCRA .................................16 8.2. Implementation Considerations .............................17 9. Conclusion .....................................................18 10. Acknowledgements ..............................................18 11. References ....................................................19 11.1. Normative References .....................................19 11.2. Informative References ...................................19 Appendix A. Reference Implementation ..............................20 Appendix B. Test Vectors Generation ...............................26 Appendix C. Test Vectors ..........................................33 C.1. One-Way Challenge Response .................................34 C.2. Mutual Challenge-Response ..................................35 C.3. Plain Signature ............................................37 M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 2]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 1. Introduction The Initiative for Open Authentication (OATH) [OATH] has identified several use cases and scenarios that require an asynchronous variant to accommodate users who do not want to maintain a synchronized authentication system. A commonly accepted method for this is to use a challenge-response scheme. Such a challenge-response mode of authentication is widely adopted in the industry. Several vendors already offer software applications and hardware devices implementing challenge-response -- but each of those uses vendor-specific proprietary algorithms. For the benefits of users there is a need for a standardized challenge-response algorithm that allows multi-sourcing of token purchases and validation systems to facilitate the democratization of strong authentication. Additionally, this specification describes the means to create symmetric key-based short 'electronic signatures'. Such signatures are variants of challenge-response mode where the data to be signed becomes the challenge or is used to derive the challenge. Note that the term 'electronic signature' and 'signature' are used interchangeably in this document. 2. Notation and Terminology The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119]. 3. Algorithm Requirements This section presents the main requirements that drove this algorithm design. A lot of emphasis was placed on flexibility and usability, under the constraints and specificity of the HMAC-based One-Time Password (HOTP) algorithm [RFC4226] and hardware token capabilities. R1 - The algorithm MUST support challenge-response-based authentication. R2 - The algorithm MUST be capable of supporting symmetric key-based short electronic signatures. Essentially, this is a variation of challenge-response where the challenge is derived from the data that needs to be signed. R3 - The algorithm MUST be capable of supporting server authentication, whereby the user can verify that he/she is talking to a trusted server. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 3]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 R4 - The algorithm SHOULD use HOTP [RFC4226] as a key building block. R5 - The length and format of the input challenge SHOULD be configurable. R6 - The output length and format of the generated response SHOULD be configurable. R7 - The challenge MAY be generated with integrity checking (e.g., parity bits). This will allow tokens with pin pads to perform simple error checking when the user enters the challenge value into a token. R8 - There MUST be a unique secret (key) for each token/soft token that is shared between the token and the authentication server. The keys MUST be randomly generated or derived using a key derivation algorithm. R9 - The algorithm MAY enable additional data attributes such as a timestamp or session information to be included in the computation. These data inputs MAY be used individually or all together. 4. OCRA Background OATH introduced the HOTP algorithm as a first open, freely available building block towards strengthening authentication for end-users in a variety of applications. One-time passwords are very efficient at solving specific security issues thanks to the dynamic nature of OTP computations. After carefully analyzing different use cases, OATH came to the conclusion that providing for extensions to the HOTP algorithms was important. A very natural extension is to introduce a challenge mode for computing HOTP values based on random questions. Equally beneficial is being able to perform mutual authentication between two parties, or short-signature computation for authenticating transaction to improve the security of e-commerce applications. 4.1. HOTP Algorithm The HOTP algorithm, as defined in [RFC4226], is based on an increasing counter value and a static symmetric key known only to the prover and verifier parties. As a reminder: HOTP(K,C) = Truncate(HMAC-SHA1(K,C)) where Truncate represents the function that converts an HMAC-SHA-1 value into an HOTP value. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 4]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 We refer the reader to [RFC4226] for the full description and further details on the rationale and security analysis of HOTP. The present document describes the different variants based on similar constructions as HOTP. 5. Definition of OCRA The OATH Challenge-Response Algorithm (OCRA) is a generalization of HOTP with variable data inputs not solely based on an incremented counter and secret key values. The definition of OCRA requires a cryptographic function, a key K and a set of DataInput parameters. This section first formally introduces OCRA and then introduces the definitions and default values recommended for all parameters. In a nutshell, OCRA = CryptoFunction(K, DataInput) where: o K: a shared secret key known to both parties o DataInput: a structure that contains the concatenation of the various input data values defined in details in section 5.1 o CryptoFunction: this is the function performing the OCRA computation from the secret key K and the DataInput material; CryptoFunction is described in details in Section 5.2 5.1. DataInput Parameters This structure is the concatenation over byte array of the OCRASuite value as defined in section 6 with the different parameters used in the computation, save for the secret key K. DataInput = {OCRASuite | 00 | C | Q | P | S | T} where: o OCRASuite is a value representing the suite of operations to compute an OCRA response o 00 is a byte value used as a separator M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 5]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 o C is an unsigned 8-byte counter value processed high-order bit first, and MUST be synchronized between all parties; It loops around from "{Hex}0" to "{Hex}FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF" and then starts over at "{Hex}0". Note that 'C' is optional for all OCRA modes described in this document. o Q, mandatory, is a 128-byte list of (concatenated) challenge question(s) generated by the parties; if Q is less than 128 bytes, then it should be padded with zeroes to the right o P is a hash (SHA-1 [RFC3174], SHA-256 and SHA-512 [SHA2] are supported) value of PIN/password that is known to all parties during the execution of the algorithm; the length of P will depend on the hash function that is used o S is a UTF-8 [RFC3629] encoded string of length up to 512 bytes that contains information about the current session; the length of S is defined in the OCRASuite string o T is an 8-byte unsigned integer in big-endian order (i.e., network byte order) representing the number of time-steps (seconds, minutes, hours, or days depending on the specified granularity) since midnight UTC of January 1, 1970 [UT]. More specifically, if the OCRA computation includes a timestamp T, you should first convert your current local time to UTC time; you can then derive the UTC time in the proper format (i.e., seconds, minutes, hours, or days elapsed from epoch time); the size of the time-step is specified in the OCRASuite string as described in Section 6.3 When computing a response, the concatenation order is always the following: C | OTHER-PARTY-GENERATED-CHALLENGE-QUESTION | YOUR-GENERATED-CHALLENGE-QUESTION | P| S | T If a value is empty (i.e., a certain input is not used in the computation) then the value is simply not represented in the string. The counter on the token or client MUST be incremented every time a new computation is requested by the user. The server's counter value MUST only be incremented after a successful OCRA authentication. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 6]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 5.2. CryptoFunction The default CryptoFunction is HOTP-SHA1-6, i.e., the default mode of computation for OCRA is HOTP with the default 6-digit dynamic truncation and a combination of DataInput values as the message to compute the HMAC-SHA1 digest. We denote t as the length in decimal digits of the truncation output. For instance, if t = 6, then the output of the truncation is a 6-digit (decimal) value. We define the HOTP family of functions as an extension to HOTP: 1. HOTP-H-t: these are the different possible truncated versions of HOTP, using the dynamic truncation method for extracting an HOTP value from the HMAC output 2. We will denote HOTP-H-t as the realization of an HOTP function that uses an HMAC function with the hash function H, and the dynamic truncation as described in [RFC4226] to extract a t-digit value 3. t=0 means that no truncation is performed and the full HMAC value is used for authentication purposes We list the following preferred modes of computation, where * denotes the default CryptoFunction: o HOTP-SHA1-4: HOTP with SHA-1 as the hash function for HMAC and a dynamic truncation to a 4-digit value; this mode is not recommended in the general case, but it can be useful when a very short authentication code is needed by an application o HOTP-SHA1-6: HOTP with SHA-1 as the hash function for HMAC and a dynamic truncation to a 6-digit value o HOTP-SHA1-8: HOTP with SHA-1 as the hash function for HMAC and a dynamic truncation to an 8-digit value o HOTP-SHA256-6: HOTP with SHA-256 as the hash function for HMAC and a dynamic truncation to a 6-digit value o HOTP-SHA512-6: HOTP with SHA-512 as the hash function for HMAC and a dynamic truncation to a 6-digit value M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 7]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 This table summarizes all possible values for the CryptoFunction: +---------------+--------------------+-------------------------+ | Name | HMAC Function Used | Size of Truncation (t) | +---------------+--------------------+-------------------------+ | HOTP-SHA1-t | HMAC-SHA1 | 0 (no truncation), 4-10 | | HOTP-SHA256-t | HMAC-SHA256 | 0 (no truncation), 4-10 | | HOTP-SHA512-t | HMAC-SHA512 | 0 (no truncation), 4-10 | +---------------+--------------------+-------------------------+ Table 1: CryptoFunction Table 6. The OCRASuite An OCRASuite value is a text string that captures one mode of operation for OCRA, completely specifying the various options for that computation. An OCRASuite value is represented as follows: <Algorithm>:<CryptoFunction>:<DataInput> The OCRASuite value is the concatenation of three sub-components that are described below. Some example OCRASuite strings are described in Section 6.4. The client and server need to agree on one or two values of OCRASuite. These values may be agreed upon at the time of token provisioning or, for more sophisticated client-server interactions, these values may be negotiated for every transaction. The provisioning of OCRA keys and related metadata such as OCRASuite is out of scope for this document. [RFC6030] specifies one key container specification that facilitates provisioning of such data between the client and the server. Note that for Mutual Challenge-Response or Signature with Server Authentication modes, the client and server will need to agree on two values of OCRASuite -- one for server computation and another for client computation. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 8]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 6.1. Algorithm Description: Indicates the version of OCRA. Values: OCRA-v where v represents the version number (e.g., 1, 2). This document specifies version 1 of OCRA. 6.2. CryptoFunction Description: Indicates the function used to compute OCRA values Values: Permitted values are described in Section 5.2. 6.3. DataInput Description: This component of the OCRASuite string captures the list of valid inputs for that computation; [] indicates a value is optional: [C] | QFxx | [PH | Snnn | TG] : Challenge-Response computation [C] | QFxx | [PH | TG] : Plain Signature computation Each input that is used for the computation is represented by a single letter (except Q), and they are separated by a hyphen. The input for challenge is further qualified by the formats supported by the client for challenge question(s). Supported values can be: +------------------+-------------------+ | Format (F) | Up to Length (xx) | +------------------+-------------------+ | A (alphanumeric) | 04-64 | | N (numeric) | 04-64 | | H (hexadecimal) | 04-64 | +------------------+-------------------+ Table 2: Challenge Format Table The default challenge format is N08, numeric and up to 8 digits. The input for P is further qualified by the hash function used for the PIN/password. Supported values for hash function can be: Hash function (H) - SHA1, SHA256, SHA512. The default hash function for P is SHA1. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 9]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 The input for S is further qualified by the length of the session data in bytes. The client and server could agree to any length but the typical values are: Length (nnn) - 064, 128, 256, and 512. The default length is 064 bytes. The input for timestamps is further qualified by G, size of the time- step. G can be specified in number of seconds, minutes, or hours: +--------------------+------------------------------+ | Time-Step Size (G) | Examples | +--------------------+------------------------------+ | [1-59]S | number of seconds, e.g., 20S | | [1-59]M | number of minutes, e.g., 5M | | [0-48]H | number of hours, e.g., 24H | +--------------------+------------------------------+ Table 3: Time-step Size Table Default value for G is 1M, i.e., time-step size is one minute and the T represents the number of minutes since epoch time [UT]. 6.4. OCRASuite Examples Here are some examples of OCRASuite strings: o "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:C-QN08-PSHA1" means version 1 of OCRA with HMAC-SHA512 function, truncated to an 8-digit value, using the counter, a random challenge, and a SHA1 digest of the PIN/password as parameters. It also indicates that the client supports only numeric challenge up to 8 digits in length o "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-6:QA10-T1M" means version 1 of OCRA with HMAC- SHA256 function, truncated to a 6-digit value, using a random alphanumeric challenge up to 10 characters in length and a timestamp in number of minutes since epoch time o "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA1-4:QH8-S512" means version 1 of OCRA with HMAC- SHA1 function, truncated to a 4-digit value, using a random hexadecimal challenge up to 8 nibbles and a session value of 512 bytes 7. Algorithm Modes for Authentication This section describes the typical modes in which the above defined computation can be used for authentication. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 10]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 7.1. One-Way Challenge-Response A challenge-response is a security mechanism in which the verifier presents a question (challenge) to the prover, who must provide a valid answer (response) to be authenticated. To use this algorithm for a one-way challenge-response, the verifier will communicate a challenge value (typically randomly generated) to the prover. The prover will use the challenge in the computation as described above. The prover then communicates the response to the verifier to authenticate. Therefore in this mode, the typical data inputs will be: C - Counter, optional. Q - Challenge question, mandatory, supplied by the verifier. P - Hashed version of PIN/password, optional. S - Session information, optional. T - Timestamp, optional. The diagram below shows the message exchange between the client (prover) and the server (verifier) to complete a one-way challenge- response authentication. It is assumed that the client and server have a pre-shared key K that is used for the computation. CLIENT SERVER (PROVER) VERIFIER) | | | Verifier sends challenge to prover | | Challenge = Q | |<---------------------------------------| | | | Prover Computes Response | | R = OCRA(K, {[C] | Q | [P | S | T]}) | | Prover sends Response = R | |--------------------------------------->| | | | Verifier Validates Response | | If Response is valid, Server sends OK | | If Response is not, Server sends NOK | |<---------------------------------------| | | M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 11]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 7.2. Mutual Challenge-Response Mutual challenge-response is a variation of one-way challenge- response where both the client and server mutually authenticate each other. To use this algorithm, the client will first send a random client- challenge to the server. The server computes the server-response and sends it to the client along with a server-challenge. The client will first verify the server-response to be assured that it is talking to a valid server. It will then compute the client- response and send it to the server to authenticate. The server verifies the client-response to complete the two-way authentication process. In this mode there are two computations: client-response and server- response. There are two separate challenge questions, generated by both parties. We denote these challenge questions Q1 and Q2. Typical data inputs for server-response computation will be: C - Counter, optional. QC - Challenge question, mandatory, supplied by the client. QS - Challenge question, mandatory, supplied by the server. S - Session information, optional. T - Timestamp, optional. Typical data inputs for client-response computation will be: C - Counter, optional. QS - Challenge question, mandatory, supplied by the server. QC - Challenge question, mandatory, supplied by the client. P - Hashed version of PIN/password, optional. S - Session information, optional. T - Timestamp, optional. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 12]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 The following diagram shows the messages that are exchanged between the client and the server to complete a two-way mutual challenge- response authentication. It is assumed that the client and server have a pre-shared key K (or pair of keys if using dual-key mode of computation) that is used for the computation. CLIENT SERVER (PROVER) (VERIFIER) | | | 1. Client sends client-challenge | | QC = Client-challenge | |------------------------------------------------->| | | | 2. Server computes server-response | | and sends server-challenge | | RS = OCRA(K, [C] | QC | QS | [S | T]) | | QS = Server-challenge | | Response = RS, QS | |<-------------------------------------------------| | | | 3. Client verifies server-response | | and computes client-response | | OCRA(K, [C] | QC | QS | [S | T]) != RS -> STOP | | RC = OCRA(K, [C] | QS | QC | [P | S | T]) | | Response = RC | |------------------------------------------------->| | | | 4. Server verifies client-response | | OCRA(K, [C] | QS | QC | [P|S|T]) != RC -> STOP | | Response = OK | |<-------------------------------------------------| | | 7.3. Algorithm Modes for Signature In this section we describe the typical modes in which the above defined computation can be used for electronic signatures. 7.3.1. Plain Signature To use this algorithm in plain signature mode, the server will communicate a signature-challenge value to the client (signer). The signature-challenge is either the data to be signed or derived from the data to be signed using a hash function, for example. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 13]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 The client will use the signature-challenge in the computation as described above. The client then communicates the signature value (response) to the server to authenticate. Therefore in this mode, the data inputs will be: C - Counter, optional. QS - Signature-challenge, mandatory, supplied by the server. P - Hashed version of PIN/password, optional. T - Timestamp, optional. The picture below shows the messages that are exchanged between the client (prover) and the server (verifier) to complete a plain signature operation. It is assumed that the client and server have a pre-shared key K that is used for the computation. CLIENT SERVER (PROVER) (VERIFIER) | | | Verifier sends signature-challenge | | Challenge = QS | |<------------------------------------------| | | | Client Computes Response | | SIGN = OCRA(K, [C] | QS | [P | T]) | | Response = SIGN | |------------------------------------------>| | | | Verifier Validates Response | | Response = OK | |<------------------------------------------| | | 7.3.2. Signature with Server Authentication This mode is a variation of the plain signature mode where the client can first authenticate the server before generating a electronic signature. To use this algorithm, the client will first send a random client- challenge to the server. The server computes the server-response and sends it to the client along with a signature-challenge. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 14]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 The client will first verify the server-response to authenticate that it is talking to a valid server. It will then compute the signature and send it to the server. In this mode there are two computations: client-signature and server- response. Typical data inputs for server-response computation will be: C - Counter, optional. QC - Challenge question, mandatory, supplied by the client. QS - Signature-challenge, mandatory, supplied by the server. T - Timestamp, optional. Typical data inputs for client-signature computation will be: C - Counter, optional. QC - Challenge question, mandatory, supplied by the client. QS - Signature-challenge, mandatory, supplied by the server. P - Hashed version of PIN/password, optional. T - Timestamp, optional. The diagram below shows the messages that are exchanged between the client and the server to complete a signature with server authentication transaction. It is assumed that the client and server have a pre-shared key K (or pair of keys if using dual-key mode of computation) that is used for the computation. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 15]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 CLIENT SERVER (PROVER) VERIFIER) | | | 1. Client sends client-challenge | | QC = Client-challenge | |-------------------------------------------------->| | | | 2. Server computes server-response | | and sends signature-challenge | | RS = OCRA(K, [C] | QC | QS | [T]) | | QS = signature-challenge | | Response = RS, QS | |<--------------------------------------------------| | | | 3. Client verifies server-response | | and computes signature | | OCRA(K, [C] | QC | QS | [T]) != RS -> STOP | | SIGN = OCRA( K, [C] | QS | QC | [P | T]) | | Response = SIGN | |-------------------------------------------------->| | | | 4. Server verifies Signature | | OCRA(K, [C] | QS | QC | [P|T]) != SIGN -> STOP | | Response = OK | |<--------------------------------------------------| | | 8. Security Considerations Any algorithm is only as secure as the application and the authentication protocols that implement it. Therefore, this section discusses the critical security requirements that our choice of algorithm imposes on the authentication protocol and validation software. 8.1. Security Analysis of OCRA The security and strength of this algorithm depend on the properties of the underlying building block HOTP, which is a construction based on HMAC [RFC2104] using SHA-1 [RFC3174] (or SHA-256 or SHA-512 [SHA2]) as the hash function. The conclusion of the security analysis detailed in [RFC4226] is that, for all practical purposes, the outputs of the dynamic truncation on distinct counter inputs are uniformly and independently distributed strings. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 16]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 The analysis demonstrates that the best possible attack against the HOTP function is the brute force attack. 8.2. Implementation Considerations IC1 - In the authentication mode, the client MUST support two-factor authentication, i.e., the communication and verification of something you know (secret code such as a password, pass phrase, PIN code, etc.) and something you have (token). The secret code is known only to the user and usually entered with the Response value for authentication purpose (two-factor authentication). Alternatively, instead of sending something you know to the server, the client may use a hash of the password or PIN code in the computation itself, thus implicitly enabling two-factor authentication. IC2 - Keys SHOULD be of the length of the CryptoFunction output to facilitate interoperability. IC3 - Keys SHOULD be chosen at random or using a cryptographically strong pseudo-random generator properly seeded with a random value. We RECOMMEND following the recommendations in [RFC4086] for all pseudo-random and random generations. The pseudo-random numbers used for generating the keys SHOULD successfully pass the randomness test specified in [CN]. IC4 - Challenge questions SHOULD be 20-byte values and MUST be at least t-byte values where t stands for the digit-length of the OCRA truncation output. IC5 - On the client side, the keys SHOULD be embedded in a tamper- resistant device or securely implemented in a software application. Additionally, by embedding the keys in a hardware device, you also have the advantage of improving the flexibility (mobility) of the authentication system. IC6 - All the communications SHOULD take place over a secure channel, e.g., SSL/TLS [RFC5246], IPsec connections. IC7 - OCRA, when used in mutual authentication mode or in signature with server authentication mode, MAY use dual-key mode -- i.e., there are two keys that are shared between the client and the server. One shared key is used to generate the server response on the server side and to verify it on the client side. The other key is used to create the response or signature on the client side and to verify it on the server side. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 17]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 IC8 - We recommend that implementations MAY use the session information, S, as an additional input in the computation. For example, S could be the session identifier from the TLS session. This will mitigate against certain types of man-in-the-middle attacks. However, this will introduce the additional dependency that first of all the prover needs to have access to the session identifier to compute the response and the verifier will need access to the session identifier to verify the response. [RFC5056] contains a relevant discussion of using Channel Bindings to Secure Channels. IC9 - In the signature mode, whenever the counter or time (defined as optional elements) are not used in the computation, there might be a risk of replay attack and the implementers should carefully consider this issue in the light of their specific application requirements and security guidelines. The server SHOULD also provide whenever possible a mean for the client (if able) to verify the validity of the signature challenge. IC10 - We also RECOMMEND storing the keys securely in the validation system, and more specifically, encrypting them using tamper-resistant hardware encryption and exposing them only when required: for example, the key is decrypted when needed to verify an OCRA response, and re-encrypted immediately to limit exposure in the RAM for a short period of time. The key store MUST be in a secure area, to avoid as much as possible direct attack on the validation system and secrets database. Particularly, access to the key material should be limited to programs and processes required by the validation system only. 9. Conclusion This document introduced several variants of HOTP for challenge- response-based authentication and short signature-like computations. The OCRASuite provides for an easy integration and support of different flavors within an authentication and validation system. Finally, OCRA should enable mutual authentication both in connected and off-line modes, with the support of different response sizes and mode of operations. 10. Acknowledgements We would like to thank Jeff Burstein, Shuh Chang, Oanh Hoang, Philip Hoyer, Jon Martinsson, Frederik Mennes, Mingliang Pei, Jonathan Tuliani, Stu Vaeth, Enrique Rodriguez, and Robert Zuccherato for their comments and suggestions to improve this document. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 18]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 11. References 11.1. Normative References [RFC2104] Krawczyk, H., Bellare, M., and R. Canetti, "HMAC: Keyed- Hashing for Message Authentication", RFC 2104, February 1997. [RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. [RFC3174] Eastlake, D. and P. Jones, "US Secure Hash Algorithm 1 (SHA1)", RFC 3174, September 2001. [RFC3629] Yergeau, F., "UTF-8, a transformation format of ISO 10646", STD 63, RFC 3629, November 2003. [RFC4086] Eastlake, D., Schiller, J., and S. Crocker, "Randomness Requirements for Security", BCP 106, RFC 4086, June 2005. [RFC4226] M'Raihi, D., Bellare, M., Hoornaert, F., Naccache, D., and O. Ranen, "HOTP: An HMAC-Based One-Time Password Algorithm", RFC 4226, December 2005. [SHA2] NIST, "FIPS PUB 180-3: Secure Hash Standard (SHS)", October 2008, <http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/ fips180-3/fips180-3_final.pdf>. 11.2. Informative References [CN] Coron, J. and D. Naccache, "An accurate evaluation of Maurer's universal test", LNCS 1556, February 1999, <http: //www.gemplus.com/smart/rd/publications/pdf/CN99maur.pdf>. [OATH] Initiative for Open Authentication, "OATH Vision", <http://www.openauthentication.org/about>. [RFC5056] Williams, N., "On the Use of Channel Bindings to Secure Channels", RFC 5056, November 2007. [RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246, August 2008. [RFC6030] Hoyer, P., Pei, M., and S. Machani, "Portable Symmetric Key Container (PSKC)", RFC 6030, October 2010. [UT] Wikipedia, "Unix time", <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unix_time>. M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 19]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 Appendix A. Reference Implementation <CODE BEGINS> /** Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). */ import javax.crypto.Mac; import javax.crypto.spec.SecretKeySpec; import java.math.BigInteger; /** * This an example implementation of OCRA. * Visit www.openauthentication.org for more information. * * @author Johan Rydell, PortWise */ public class OCRA { private OCRA() {} /** * This method uses the JCE to provide the crypto * algorithm. * HMAC computes a Hashed Message Authentication Code with the * crypto hash algorithm as a parameter. * * @param crypto the crypto algorithm (HmacSHA1, HmacSHA256, * HmacSHA512) * @param keyBytes the bytes to use for the HMAC key * @param text the message or text to be authenticated. */ private static byte[] hmac_sha1(String crypto, byte[] keyBytes, byte[] text){ Mac hmac = null; try { hmac = Mac.getInstance(crypto); SecretKeySpec macKey = new SecretKeySpec(keyBytes, "RAW"); M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 20]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 hmac.init(macKey); return hmac.doFinal(text); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } return null; } private static final int[] DIGITS_POWER // 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 = {1,10,100,1000,10000,100000,1000000,10000000,100000000 }; /** * This method converts HEX string to Byte[] * * @param hex the HEX string * * @return A byte array */ private static byte[] hexStr2Bytes(String hex){ // Adding one byte to get the right conversion // values starting with "0" can be converted byte[] bArray = new BigInteger("10" + hex,16).toByteArray(); // Copy all the REAL bytes, not the "first" byte[] ret = new byte[bArray.length - 1]; System.arraycopy(bArray, 1, ret, 0, ret.length); return ret; } /** * This method generates an OCRA HOTP value for the given * set of parameters. * * @param ocraSuite the OCRA Suite * @param key the shared secret, HEX encoded * @param counter the counter that changes on a per use * basis, HEX encoded * @param question the challenge question, HEX encoded * @param password a password that can be used, HEX encoded * @param sessionInformation Static information that identifies * the current session, Hex encoded * @param timeStamp a value that reflects a time * * @return A numeric String in base 10 that includes * {@link truncationDigits} digits M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 21]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 */ static public String generateOCRA(String ocraSuite, String key, String counter, String question, String password, String sessionInformation, String timeStamp){ int codeDigits = 0; String crypto = ""; String result = null; int ocraSuiteLength = (ocraSuite.getBytes()).length; int counterLength = 0; int questionLength = 0; int passwordLength = 0; int sessionInformationLength = 0; int timeStampLength = 0; // The OCRASuites components String CryptoFunction = ocraSuite.split(":")[1]; String DataInput = ocraSuite.split(":")[2]; if(CryptoFunction.toLowerCase().indexOf("sha1") > 1) crypto = "HmacSHA1"; if(CryptoFunction.toLowerCase().indexOf("sha256") > 1) crypto = "HmacSHA256"; if(CryptoFunction.toLowerCase().indexOf("sha512") > 1) crypto = "HmacSHA512"; // How many digits should we return codeDigits = Integer.decode(CryptoFunction.substring( CryptoFunction.lastIndexOf("-")+1)); // The size of the byte array message to be encrypted // Counter if(DataInput.toLowerCase().startsWith("c")) { // Fix the length of the HEX string while(counter.length() < 16) counter = "0" + counter; counterLength=8; } // Question - always 128 bytes if(DataInput.toLowerCase().startsWith("q") || (DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("-q") >= 0)) { while(question.length() < 256) question = question + "0"; M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 22]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 questionLength=128; } // Password - sha1 if(DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("psha1") > 1){ while(password.length() < 40) password = "0" + password; passwordLength=20; } // Password - sha256 if(DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("psha256") > 1){ while(password.length() < 64) password = "0" + password; passwordLength=32; } // Password - sha512 if(DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("psha512") > 1){ while(password.length() < 128) password = "0" + password; passwordLength=64; } // sessionInformation - s064 if(DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("s064") > 1){ while(sessionInformation.length() < 128) sessionInformation = "0" + sessionInformation; sessionInformationLength=64; } // sessionInformation - s128 if(DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("s128") > 1){ while(sessionInformation.length() < 256) sessionInformation = "0" + sessionInformation; sessionInformationLength=128; } // sessionInformation - s256 if(DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("s256") > 1){ while(sessionInformation.length() < 512) sessionInformation = "0" + sessionInformation; sessionInformationLength=256; } // sessionInformation - s512 if(DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("s512") > 1){ while(sessionInformation.length() < 1024) M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 23]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 sessionInformation = "0" + sessionInformation; sessionInformationLength=512; } // TimeStamp if(DataInput.toLowerCase().startsWith("t") || (DataInput.toLowerCase().indexOf("-t") > 1)){ while(timeStamp.length() < 16) timeStamp = "0" + timeStamp; timeStampLength=8; } // Remember to add "1" for the "00" byte delimiter byte[] msg = new byte[ocraSuiteLength + counterLength + questionLength + passwordLength + sessionInformationLength + timeStampLength + 1]; // Put the bytes of "ocraSuite" parameters into the message byte[] bArray = ocraSuite.getBytes(); System.arraycopy(bArray, 0, msg, 0, bArray.length); // Delimiter msg[bArray.length] = 0x00; // Put the bytes of "Counter" to the message // Input is HEX encoded if(counterLength > 0 ){ bArray = hexStr2Bytes(counter); System.arraycopy(bArray, 0, msg, ocraSuiteLength + 1, bArray.length); } // Put the bytes of "question" to the message // Input is text encoded if(questionLength > 0 ){ bArray = hexStr2Bytes(question); System.arraycopy(bArray, 0, msg, ocraSuiteLength + 1 + counterLength, bArray.length); } // Put the bytes of "password" to the message // Input is HEX encoded M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 24]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 if(passwordLength > 0){ bArray = hexStr2Bytes(password); System.arraycopy(bArray, 0, msg, ocraSuiteLength + 1 + counterLength + questionLength, bArray.length); } // Put the bytes of "sessionInformation" to the message // Input is text encoded if(sessionInformationLength > 0 ){ bArray = hexStr2Bytes(sessionInformation); System.arraycopy(bArray, 0, msg, ocraSuiteLength + 1 + counterLength + questionLength + passwordLength, bArray.length); } // Put the bytes of "time" to the message // Input is text value of minutes if(timeStampLength > 0){ bArray = hexStr2Bytes(timeStamp); System.arraycopy(bArray, 0, msg, ocraSuiteLength + 1 + counterLength + questionLength + passwordLength + sessionInformationLength, bArray.length); } bArray = hexStr2Bytes(key); byte[] hash = hmac_sha1(crypto, bArray, msg); // put selected bytes into result int int offset = hash[hash.length - 1] & 0xf; int binary = ((hash[offset] & 0x7f) << 24) | ((hash[offset + 1] & 0xff) << 16) | ((hash[offset + 2] & 0xff) << 8) | (hash[offset + 3] & 0xff); int otp = binary % DIGITS_POWER[codeDigits]; result = Integer.toString(otp); while (result.length() < codeDigits) { result = "0" + result; } return result; } } M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 25]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 <CODE ENDS> Appendix B. Test Vectors Generation <CODE BEGINS> /** Copyright (c) 2011 IETF Trust and the persons identified as authors of the code. All rights reserved. Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject to the license terms contained in, the Simplified BSD License set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents (http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info). */ import java.math.BigInteger; import java.util.*; import java.text.DateFormat; import java.text.SimpleDateFormat; public class TestOCRA { public static String asHex (byte buf[]) { StringBuffer strbuf = new StringBuffer(buf.length * 2); int i; for (i = 0; i < buf.length; i++) { if (((int) buf[i] & 0xff) < 0x10) strbuf.append("0"); strbuf.append(Long.toString((int) buf[i] & 0xff, 16)); } return strbuf.toString(); } /** * @param args */ public static void main(String[] args) { String ocra = ""; String seed = ""; String ocraSuite = ""; String counter = ""; String password = ""; String sessionInformation = ""; String question = ""; M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 26]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 String qHex = ""; String timeStamp = ""; // PASS1234 is SHA1 hash of "1234" String PASS1234 = "7110eda4d09e062aa5e4a390b0a572ac0d2c0220"; String SEED = "3132333435363738393031323334353637383930"; String SEED32 = "31323334353637383930313233343536373839" + "30313233343536373839303132"; String SEED64 = "31323334353637383930313233343536373839" + "3031323334353637383930313233343536373839" + "3031323334353637383930313233343536373839" + "3031323334"; int STOP = 5; Date myDate = Calendar.getInstance().getTime(); BigInteger b = new BigInteger("0"); String sDate = "Mar 25 2008, 12:06:30 GMT"; try{ DateFormat df = new SimpleDateFormat("MMM dd yyyy, HH:mm:ss zzz"); myDate = df.parse(sDate); b = new BigInteger("0" + myDate.getTime()); b = b.divide(new BigInteger("60000")); System.out.println("Time of \"" + sDate + "\" is in"); System.out.println("milli sec: " + myDate.getTime()); System.out.println("minutes: " + b.toString()); System.out.println("minutes (HEX encoded): " + b.toString(16).toUpperCase()); System.out.println("Time of \"" + sDate + "\" is the same as this localized"); System.out.println("time, \"" + new Date(myDate.getTime()) + "\""); System.out.println(); System.out.println("Standard 20Byte key: " + "3132333435363738393031323334353637383930"); System.out.println("Standard 32Byte key: " + "3132333435363738393031323334353637383930"); System.out.println(" " + "313233343536373839303132"); System.out.println("Standard 64Byte key: 313233343536373839" + "3031323334353637383930"); System.out.println(" 313233343536373839" + "3031323334353637383930"); M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 27]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 System.out.println(" 313233343536373839" + "3031323334353637383930"); System.out.println(" 31323334"); System.out.println(); System.out.println("Plain challenge response"); System.out.println("========================"); System.out.println(); ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA1-6:QN08"; System.out.println(ocraSuite); System.out.println("======================="); seed = SEED; counter = ""; question = ""; password = ""; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = ""; for(int i=0; i < 10; i++){ question = "" + i + i + i + i + i + i + i + i; qHex = new String((new BigInteger(question,10)) .toString(16)).toUpperCase(); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter, qHex,password, sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println("Key: Standard 20Byte Q: " + question + " OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:C-QN08-PSHA1"; System.out.println(ocraSuite); System.out.println("================================="); seed = SEED32; counter = ""; question = "12345678"; password = PASS1234; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = ""; for(int i=0; i < 10; i++){ counter = "" + i; qHex = new String((new BigInteger(question,10)) .toString(16)).toUpperCase(); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter, qHex,password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println("Key: Standard 32Byte C: " + counter + " Q: " + question + " PIN(1234): "); M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 28]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 System.out.println(password + " OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QN08-PSHA1"; System.out.println(ocraSuite); System.out.println("==============================="); seed = SEED32; counter = ""; question = ""; password = PASS1234; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = ""; for(int i=0; i < STOP; i++){ question = "" + i + i + i + i + i + i + i + i; qHex = new String((new BigInteger(question,10)) .toString(16)).toUpperCase(); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter, qHex,password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println("Key: Standard 32Byte Q: " + question + " PIN(1234): "); System.out.println(password + " OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:C-QN08"; System.out.println(ocraSuite); System.out.println("==========================="); seed = SEED64; counter = ""; question = ""; password = ""; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = ""; for(int i=0; i < 10; i++){ question = "" + i + i + i + i + i + i + i + i; qHex = new String((new BigInteger(question,10)) .toString(16)).toUpperCase(); counter = "0000" + i; ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter, qHex,password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println("Key: Standard 64Byte C: " + counter + " Q: " + question + " OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 29]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QN08-T1M"; System.out.println(ocraSuite); System.out.println("============================="); seed = SEED64; counter = ""; question = ""; password = ""; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = b.toString(16); for(int i=0; i < STOP; i++){ question = "" + i + i + i + i + i + i + i + i; counter = ""; qHex = new String((new BigInteger(question,10)) .toString(16)).toUpperCase(); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter, qHex,password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println("Key: Standard 64Byte Q: " + question +" T: " + timeStamp.toUpperCase() + " OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); System.out.println(); System.out.println("Mutual Challenge Response"); System.out.println("========================="); System.out.println(); ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QA08"; System.out.println("OCRASuite (server computation) = " + ocraSuite); System.out.println("OCRASuite (client computation) = " + ocraSuite); System.out.println("===============================" + "==========================="); seed = SEED32; counter = ""; question = ""; password = ""; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = ""; for(int i=0; i < STOP; i++){ question = "CLI2222" + i + "SRV1111" + i; qHex = asHex(question.getBytes()); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter,qHex, password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println( M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 30]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 "(server)Key: Standard 32Byte Q: " + question + " OCRA: " + ocra); question = "SRV1111" + i + "CLI2222" + i; qHex = asHex(question.getBytes()); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter,qHex, password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println( "(client)Key: Standard 32Byte Q: " + question + " OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); String ocraSuite1 = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA08"; String ocraSuite2 = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA08-PSHA1"; System.out.println("OCRASuite (server computation) = " + ocraSuite1); System.out.println("OCRASuite (client computation) = " + ocraSuite2); System.out.println("===============================" + "================================="); ocraSuite = ""; seed = SEED64; counter = ""; question = ""; password = ""; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = ""; for(int i=0; i < STOP; i++){ ocraSuite = ocraSuite1; question = "CLI2222" + i + "SRV1111" + i; qHex = asHex(question.getBytes()); password = ""; ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter,qHex, password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println( "(server)Key: Standard 64Byte Q: " + question + " OCRA: " + ocra); ocraSuite = ocraSuite2; question = "SRV1111" + i + "CLI2222" + i; qHex = asHex(question.getBytes()); password = PASS1234; ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter,qHex, password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println("(client)Key: Standard 64Byte Q: " + question); M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 31]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 System.out.println("P: " + password.toUpperCase() + " OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); System.out.println(); System.out.println("Plain Signature"); System.out.println("==============="); System.out.println(); ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QA08"; System.out.println(ocraSuite); System.out.println("========================="); seed = SEED32; counter = ""; question = ""; password = ""; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = ""; for(int i=0; i < STOP; i++){ question = "SIG1" + i + "000"; qHex = asHex(question.getBytes()); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter,qHex, password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println( "Key: Standard 32Byte Q(Signature challenge): " + question); System.out.println(" OCRA: " + ocra); } System.out.println(); ocraSuite = "OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA10-T1M"; System.out.println(ocraSuite); System.out.println("============================="); seed = SEED64; counter = ""; question = ""; password = ""; sessionInformation = ""; timeStamp = b.toString(16); for(int i=0; i < STOP; i++){ question = "SIG1" + i + "00000"; qHex = asHex(question.getBytes()); ocra = OCRA.generateOCRA(ocraSuite,seed,counter, qHex,password,sessionInformation,timeStamp); System.out.println( "Key: Standard 64Byte Q(Signature challenge): " + question); System.out.println(" T: " M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 32]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 + timeStamp.toUpperCase() + " OCRA: " + ocra); } }catch (Exception e){ System.out.println("Error : " + e); } } } <CODE ENDS> Appendix C. Test Vectors This section provides test values that can be used for the OCRA interoperability test. Standard 20Byte key: 3132333435363738393031323334353637383930 Standard 32Byte key: 3132333435363738393031323334353637383930313233343536373839303132 Standard 64Byte key: 313233343536373839303132333435363738393031323334353637383930313233343 53637383930313233343536373839303132333435363738393031323334 PIN (1234) SHA1 hash value: 7110eda4d09e062aa5e4a390b0a572ac0d2c0220 M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 33]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 C.1. One-Way Challenge Response +-----------------+----------+------------+ | Key | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+----------+------------+ | Standard 20Byte | 00000000 | 237653 | | Standard 20Byte | 11111111 | 243178 | | Standard 20Byte | 22222222 | 653583 | | Standard 20Byte | 33333333 | 740991 | | Standard 20Byte | 44444444 | 608993 | | Standard 20Byte | 55555555 | 388898 | | Standard 20Byte | 66666666 | 816933 | | Standard 20Byte | 77777777 | 224598 | | Standard 20Byte | 88888888 | 750600 | | Standard 20Byte | 99999999 | 294470 | +-----------------+----------+------------+ OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA1-6:QN08 +-----------------+---+----------+------------+ | Key | C | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+---+----------+------------+ | Standard 32Byte | 0 | 12345678 | 65347737 | | Standard 32Byte | 1 | 12345678 | 86775851 | | Standard 32Byte | 2 | 12345678 | 78192410 | | Standard 32Byte | 3 | 12345678 | 71565254 | | Standard 32Byte | 4 | 12345678 | 10104329 | | Standard 32Byte | 5 | 12345678 | 65983500 | | Standard 32Byte | 6 | 12345678 | 70069104 | | Standard 32Byte | 7 | 12345678 | 91771096 | | Standard 32Byte | 8 | 12345678 | 75011558 | | Standard 32Byte | 9 | 12345678 | 08522129 | +-----------------+---+----------+------------+ OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:C-QN08-PSHA1 +-----------------+----------+------------+ | Key | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+----------+------------+ | Standard 32Byte | 00000000 | 83238735 | | Standard 32Byte | 11111111 | 01501458 | | Standard 32Byte | 22222222 | 17957585 | | Standard 32Byte | 33333333 | 86776967 | | Standard 32Byte | 44444444 | 86807031 | +-----------------+----------+------------+ OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QN08-PSHA1 M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 34]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 +-----------------+-------+----------+------------+ | Key | C | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+-------+----------+------------+ | Standard 64Byte | 00000 | 00000000 | 07016083 | | Standard 64Byte | 00001 | 11111111 | 63947962 | | Standard 64Byte | 00002 | 22222222 | 70123924 | | Standard 64Byte | 00003 | 33333333 | 25341727 | | Standard 64Byte | 00004 | 44444444 | 33203315 | | Standard 64Byte | 00005 | 55555555 | 34205738 | | Standard 64Byte | 00006 | 66666666 | 44343969 | | Standard 64Byte | 00007 | 77777777 | 51946085 | | Standard 64Byte | 00008 | 88888888 | 20403879 | | Standard 64Byte | 00009 | 99999999 | 31409299 | +-----------------+-------+----------+------------+ OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:C-QN08 +-----------------+----------+---------+------------+ | Key | Q | T | OCRA Value | +-----------------+----------+---------+------------+ | Standard 64Byte | 00000000 | 132d0b6 | 95209754 | | Standard 64Byte | 11111111 | 132d0b6 | 55907591 | | Standard 64Byte | 22222222 | 132d0b6 | 22048402 | | Standard 64Byte | 33333333 | 132d0b6 | 24218844 | | Standard 64Byte | 44444444 | 132d0b6 | 36209546 | +-----------------+----------+---------+------------+ OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QN08-T1M C.2. Mutual Challenge-Response OCRASuite (server computation) = OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QA08 OCRASuite (client computation) = OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QA08 +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Key | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Standard 32Byte | CLI22220SRV11110 | 28247970 | | Standard 32Byte | CLI22221SRV11111 | 01984843 | | Standard 32Byte | CLI22222SRV11112 | 65387857 | | Standard 32Byte | CLI22223SRV11113 | 03351211 | | Standard 32Byte | CLI22224SRV11114 | 83412541 | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ Server -- OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QA08 M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 35]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Key | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Standard 32Byte | SRV11110CLI22220 | 15510767 | | Standard 32Byte | SRV11111CLI22221 | 90175646 | | Standard 32Byte | SRV11112CLI22222 | 33777207 | | Standard 32Byte | SRV11113CLI22223 | 95285278 | | Standard 32Byte | SRV11114CLI22224 | 28934924 | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ Client -- OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QA08 OCRASuite (server computation) = OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA08 OCRASuite (client computation) = OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA08-PSHA1 +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Key | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Standard 64Byte | CLI22220SRV11110 | 79496648 | | Standard 64Byte | CLI22221SRV11111 | 76831980 | | Standard 64Byte | CLI22222SRV11112 | 12250499 | | Standard 64Byte | CLI22223SRV11113 | 90856481 | | Standard 64Byte | CLI22224SRV11114 | 12761449 | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ Server -- OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA08 +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Key | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ | Standard 64Byte | SRV11110CLI22220 | 18806276 | | Standard 64Byte | SRV11111CLI22221 | 70020315 | | Standard 64Byte | SRV11112CLI22222 | 01600026 | | Standard 64Byte | SRV11113CLI22223 | 18951020 | | Standard 64Byte | SRV11114CLI22224 | 32528969 | +-----------------+------------------+------------+ Client -- OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA08-PSHA1 M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 36]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 C.3. Plain Signature In this mode of operation, Q represents the signature challenge. +-----------------+----------+------------+ | Key | Q | OCRA Value | +-----------------+----------+------------+ | Standard 32Byte | SIG10000 | 53095496 | | Standard 32Byte | SIG11000 | 04110475 | | Standard 32Byte | SIG12000 | 31331128 | | Standard 32Byte | SIG13000 | 76028668 | | Standard 32Byte | SIG14000 | 46554205 | +-----------------+----------+------------+ OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA256-8:QA08 +-----------------+------------+---------+------------+ | Key | Q | T | OCRA Value | +-----------------+------------+---------+------------+ | Standard 64Byte | SIG1000000 | 132d0b6 | 77537423 | | Standard 64Byte | SIG1100000 | 132d0b6 | 31970405 | | Standard 64Byte | SIG1200000 | 132d0b6 | 10235557 | | Standard 64Byte | SIG1300000 | 132d0b6 | 95213541 | | Standard 64Byte | SIG1400000 | 132d0b6 | 65360607 | +-----------------+------------+---------+------------+ OCRA-1:HOTP-SHA512-8:QA10-T1M M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 37]
RFC 6287 OCRA June 2011 Authors' Addresses David M'Raihi Verisign, Inc. 487 E. Middlefield Road Mountain View, CA 94043 USA EMail: davidietf@gmail.com Johan Rydell Portwise, Inc. 275 Hawthorne Ave, Suite 119 Palo Alto, CA 94301 USA EMail: johanietf@gmail.com Siddharth Bajaj Symantec Corp. 350 Ellis Street Mountain View, CA 94043 USA EMail: siddharthietf@gmail.com Salah Machani Diversinet Corp. 2225 Sheppard Avenue East, Suite 1801 Toronto, Ontario M2J 5C2 Canada EMail: smachani@diversinet.com David Naccache Ecole Normale Superieure ENS DI, 45 rue d'Ulm Paris, 75005 France EMail: david.naccache@ens.fr M'Raihi, et al. Informational [Page 38]